Tekla connector

Tekla connector would be interesting. Tekla Structures has a very good live-linking with Grasshopper but many (>99%) users don’t either have it or don’t know how to use it.

Having TS Speckle connector would essentially make my TS license redundant in many cases and would probably save me several thousands of euros annually… :sweat_smile:

PS. if you use Tekla and GH together soon you can create ‘native’ TS plugins running Grasshopper scripts in the back end.

2 Likes

Welcome to our forum Rasmus!

Thanks for the suggestion, I agree that a Tekla connector could be a good follow-up to our ETABS one!
Plus, we have a pretty good relationship with some Tekla developers already :slight_smile:
Cc @Reynold_Chan

(I might split this topic in a new one)

4 Likes

I also would love to see a Tekla Structures connector. It would be very useful for us. Is this already in development?

3 Likes

Hi @eestrado! Not ongoing work happening as we speak, but it’s on the horizon (read: next in line!).

What usually helps us a lot is understanding the workflows that you’re after, so we can make sure we’re developing the “right thing”. If you have the time to share some extra information what you’d want to achieve with a Speckle Tekla Connector, we’d be really grateful!

1 Like

Hi Everyone. We have a desktop app that already connect a structural building model with Tekla Structure via API. We’ve would be interested in do so connection via Speckle (OurApp <–> Speckle <–> Tekla) to take advantage of all the Speckle features.

3 Likes

Sure! I would be willing to offer some insight into the workflow we’re looking for.

2 Likes

What I first had in mind when I asked about the Tekla connector was the ability to transfer my Tekla model to Rhino and then be able to work further on positions that are far more easy to be done in Rhino-Grasshopper than in Tekla. For example, if I am working on a big and complex glass facade I will tend to make all the steel supporting construction in Tekla, but the glass panels and the aluminium profiles in Rhino-Grasshopper. If the workflow is neat I would use it even for simple projects to work on different type on claddings and facade details.

Next area of usage would be what @Kateryna mentioned about Presentation constructor based on web-viewer. This would help a lot for quick preparation of RFI’s and presentations and has a lot of potential for development in future (3D printing of parts, VR preview…)

Furthermore, I am not sure what information can be collected from the Tekla model using this connector, but if it takes info of the section profile, length, weight, surface area e.t.c. then the usage of the Tekla connector with Excel connector will be very powerful.

I can go on with other areas of usages as well, but would need to know a little bit more what a potential connector could do.

@leorufus just curious, what is yout desktop app about ?

4 Likes

Hello ! loving these discussions on Tekla Structures connector. Keep them coming. I’m mainly the guy responsible for the Speckle implementation of structural stuff. You can take a look at the workflows over here with ETABS. Albeit ETABS is a very different software from Tekla Structures. So the limitation of what can be done with a connector is really limited by the API of a program. We’ll try our best to help grab the data from Tekla as much as possible.

Most of our structural connectors will revolve around the structural kit.. So check this out about how we’re planning to make Structural data/model as accessible in general.

Haven’t had much personal experience with Tekla Structures but seems like a fun version of IdeaStatica. Just a question about the 3D printing parts and VR preview, is this something that you guys are currently doing already in terms of visualization?

1 Like

You might be little off of what Tekla Structures is … :sweat_smile:
It’s structural models yes but BIM and not for analysis. The API is quite developed and well documented so I wouldn’t expect a lot of issues on that part.

Personally I’d like to skip owning a TS license and make the designer send relevant objects and info for construction site designing, management and 4D planning. Maybe even send back through Speckle to enrich the model with live statuses, sequencing etc. produced for construction.

1 Like

Haha thanks for the clarification :slight_smile: might have been thinking of tekla structural designer when i was talking again.

I’m a bit perplexed by how you would be skipping owning a TS license? Wouldn’t you need to own a TS license to still use the designer? Or do you mean more like other people sending you a speckle object as opposed to a Tekla Object? Maybe I’m not following along. Well we’ll probably still use the geometric aspects of the structural objects kit to be the driving force behind many of the conversions for grabbing objects out of the Tekla world and into speckle world for you to play around with.

I don’t think anyone on this thread has mentioned using Tekla Structural Designer. I don’t know much about it but I wouldn’t use it for anything personally…

Anyways I use Rhino&Grasshopper and only reason why I need it is to connect to designers models to receive updates without continuous IFC file transfer.

1 Like

@Reynold_Chan, from my perspective, I would say you are lucky not to have to deal with Tekla on daily basis :smiley: Anyway, in the world of steel construction it is the most used software (together with Autodesk Advance Steel) for 3D modeling, detailing and execution of all kinds of drawings and fabrication files for steel constructions. I believe that all of the steel constructions in the highly developed countries today are done in one of these two software.

I am familiar with ETABS but I don’t use it, as most of the companies here are using AxisVM, Dlubal or Autodesk Robot for structural analysis of the constructions. IDEA StatiCa is the most famous one for structural analysis of steel connections, but I don’t see any benefit from Speckle there, because there is a plug in and I can already transfer my geometry from Tekla there.

Regarding your question. We are 3D printing samples and parts of constructions for visualization for quite some time (few years). The possibility for a VR preview of construction is still not well developed, but definitely will be an option in near future. It is probably the direction the whole construction industry will need to follow. Hopefully Speckle too… :smiley:

2 Likes

For us we are a steel construction company and we use Tekla Structures as our primary BIM modelling program. However, especially recently, projects demand Revit/Navisworks models for coordination with BIM360. Thus we have to go through the painful process of exporting an IFC from Tekla then importing into Revit every week or so. My idea was to have Speckle as the link between the two so that it would be a more seamless process, models can be updated instead of a brand new one exported every time, and avoid running into import/export problems especially with very large models. As @RSainmaa says the Tekla OpenAPI is very developed and well documented. I use it a lot in my work.

3 Likes