Hi @Community & happy Friday (or Saturday if youāre far off east)!
As you know, weāve wrapped up 2021 having 19 connectors for various CAD, BIM, 3D design, and data analytics software.
This is an amazing achievement - we hope youāre all enjoying the interoperability, automation opportunities, and data wrangling flexibility this gives you. Kudos to all our contributors !
Nevertheless, our mission of liberating people from proprietary file formats and software monopolies and to build an open digital infrastructure for the future of anything designed in 3D is not complete yet!
Thatās why our team is starting to focus on what integrations to develop next, help us decide!
Hereās a list of the Connectors we already have:
Donāt see your favorite software in the list below? Let us know in a comment and weāll add it!
Itād be also super helpful to hear the main use cases youād need these connectors for .
You all have 3 votes , choose wisely!
BricsCAD
FreeCAD
FME
Inventor
ArcGIS
Navisworks
Allplan
Maya
3ds Max
Solidworks
Vectorworks
Robot
RAM Structural
SAP2000
STAAD Pro
Edificius
VisualARQ
Procore
0voters
EDIT - we cannot modify the poll, but these were all suggested as well:
We would need a connector that works with Bentley Microstation, Open Building Designer, Context Capture. It would be amazing if you would take the time to develop a connector that works with the Bentley products.
A very niche request, and very tangential to AEC, but to go along with Unity and Unreal, itād be great to see a Godot connector, especially with its 4th release coming soon
Thanks for suggesting these, Iām actually quite excited to see non-AEC-specific software being suggested! Do you have examples of workflows where a Speckle integration would help?
Iām guessing itād make the process of creating architectural visualizations faster and more iterative starting from tools such as Rhino and Revit? Or maybe you have something substantially different in mind?
you can get involved with the Tekla connector by helping suggest workflows that you need in particular in this thread or sending me models to test out the alpha on or be a tester when the alpha gets released. If you want to speed the development along faster, we can talk more to see how we can get you started.
Two cases - either as an import tool pulling scenes into the editor for further manipulation, or live, as part of some live showcase/optioneering app to put in front of clients.
Faster visualisation, continuity of attribuition (which an fbx/obj conversion would demolish), all in favour of visualisation.
(Side thought re. navisā¦ a ācomment/taskā schema would allow you to do things like commit to-do tasks through a vis app and have them populate the navis model?)
Plant 3D has 2 big sections, a schematic design tool to produce P&IDs (piping and instrumentation diagrams), as well as a 3D modelling environment which creates 3d piping models, for the most part. Itās a bit like fabrication MEP, but sits on AutoCAD and also produces āparametricā models of equipment items (configurators for pumps, vessels, heat exchangers). As Autodesk have it, everything sits on a collection of SQLite databases, with an option to key into SQL server and BIM360 collaboration. Key powers of Plant versus others:
āSpecification drivenā piping. Basically, a series/collection of components which may be applied to different conditions such as service (chilled water, avgas, effluent, steam). This includes an acceptable selection of valves, filters, guages, flanges and couplings, branch connectors and so forth, which can also change at different diameters.
Validation between piping and P&ID databases.
Generaton of āpiping isometric drawingsā.
Creation and control of systems and their connections between collections of equipment items and facility areas.
Workflow
We would like to be able to move 3D plant data without losing connection information, attributes or geometric fidelity in particular to Revit for the management of these families and creation of better deliverables. Weāve found that the AutoCAD drawing engine as they have it, is no longer appropriate for the risk and effort levels required, for example:
time it takes to generate a single view. Instead of (more or less) instantaneous performance we can attain from Revit, plant 3d goes through a process of āflat shottingā and layer reassignments, so this process can take minutes or more
disassociated annotations such as sections and view titles.
Also - there is no visual scripting environment for Plant 3D available. If we are able to create connector(s) which understand each schema then we open up to the opportunity to create a more user friendly automation library.
Iāve done an AU preso on some of these issues, which might explain these more.
Thanks for the detailed workflow @Matthew_Randell !
Iām still shocked at how poorly interoperable Autodesk software is - weāll definitely check out what we can do
Itād be great to see an OpenLCA connector. @timmcginley is launching a new LCA in Building course at DTU and we are working on easing LCA evaluation, integration with modelling in a BIM environment. More integration with software oriented on circular building and sustainability could be awesome! Thank you.
I see a lot of people have voted for Navisworks, how do you see that integration working? What information would you like to exchange with Speckle and how do you see it working overall?
As someone who works for General Contractor, sometimes we only get Navis files from the Appointing Party in the tendering process. Having all the info and geometry available in Grasshopper would save me a lot of time I think.
!
Thatās why our team is starting to focus on what integrations to develop next, help us decide! 
software in the list below? Let us know in a comment and weāll add it!
.
, choose wisely!
