Magneg
(Magne Ganz)
13 October 2022 10:42
1
The Speckle App for Revit cannot send Space. I would like to be able to do that. If the Architech use Archicad, then the MEP disciplines in Revit will use Space in Revit (not Room).
1 Like
Magneg
(Magne Ganz)
13 October 2022 10:46
2
It works when manually selected. But that is not possible with several Levels at the same time.
1 Like
Magneg
(Magne Ganz)
13 October 2022 10:55
3
Workaorund: Manually select all Spaces from Schedule.
2 Likes
jonathon
(Jonathon)
13 October 2022 15:23
4
I have raised an issue for this as it looks like it should be an easy fix - the connector clearly can convert spaces but doesn’t offer the option in the UI.
It may not make it into the imminent upcoming release, but if it doesn’t, it should be possible as a patch shortly after. I’ll make sure to feedback here as soon as it does.
2 Likes
jonathon
(Jonathon)
14 October 2022 12:08
6
Update: Fix ready for implementation
specklesystems:release/2.9
← specklesystems:revit/connor/add-category-spaces
opened 07:49PM - 13 Oct 22 UTC
<!---
Provide a short summary in the Title above. Examples of good PR titles:…
* "Feature: adds metrics to component"
* "Fix: resolves duplication in comment thread"
* "Update: apollo v2.34.0"
-->
## Description & motivation
MEP spaces are currenly not selectable as a category to send to speckle
Closes https://github.com/specklesystems/speckle-sharp/issues/1714
<!---
Describe your changes, and why you're making them. What benefit will this have to others?
Is this linked to an open Github issue, a thread in Speckle community,
or another pull request? Link it here.
If it is related to a Github issue, and resolves it, please link to the issue number, e.g.:
Fixes #85, Fixes #22, Fixes username/repo#123
Connects #123
-->
## Changes:
- adds spaces as a supported built in category
- enable sending space will a null outline
<!---
- Item 1
- Item 2
-->
## References
Community request https://speckle.community/t/send-spaces-from-revit/3801
<!---
(Optional -- remove this section if not needed )
Include **important** links regarding the implementation of this PR.
This usually includes a RFC or an aggregation of issues and/or individual conversations
that helped put this solution together. This helps ensure we retain and share knowledge
regarding the implementation, and may help others understand motivation and design decisions etc..
-->
1 Like