Object created with 'Object Doe'

Help Speckle v1 (old)
1

Hey,

I’ve been passing data from Dynamo and reading that data into Python. For instance, I’m sending 4 x-coordinates from dynamo.

However, when pulling this data in Python, it appears that 6 speckle objects are being picked up. 4 of them contain the coordinate data, but the other 2 contain no values and come through with a name of ‘Object Doe’. Can anyone explain what is happening here?

Here are the objects in python:

id=‘6008558c7019f80ae0ef1264’ private=False canRead=[] canWrite=[] owner=‘5ff72ccb7019f80ae0edeb69’ anonymousComments=False comments=[] createdAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.134Z’ updatedAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.134Z’ type=‘Number’ name=None geometryHash=None hash=‘57f22fd71e8b5c1b69761bb9c895c616’ applicationId=None properties=None partOf=None parent=None children=[] ancestors=[] value=-7721.211896044507 __v=0 deleted=False

id=‘6008558c7019f80ae0ef1266’ private=False canRead=[] canWrite=[] owner=‘5ff72ccb7019f80ae0edeb69’ anonymousComments=False comments=[] createdAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.135Z’ updatedAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.135Z’ type=‘Number’ name=None geometryHash=None hash=‘39f2c508497a64ffe6d17526be377de6’ applicationId=None properties=None partOf=None parent=None children=[] ancestors=[] value=-301.1495434909622 __v=0 deleted=False

id=‘6008558c7019f80ae0ef1266’ private=False canRead=[] canWrite=[] owner=‘5ff72ccb7019f80ae0edeb69’ anonymousComments=False comments=[] createdAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.135Z’ updatedAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.135Z’ type=‘Number’ name=None geometryHash=None hash=‘39f2c508497a64ffe6d17526be377de6’ applicationId=None properties=None partOf=None parent=None children=[] ancestors=[] value=-301.1495434909622 __v=0 deleted=False

id=‘6008558c7019f80ae0ef1267’ private=False canRead=[] canWrite=[] owner=‘5ff72ccb7019f80ae0edeb69’ anonymousComments=False comments=[] createdAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.135Z’ updatedAt=‘2021-01-20T16:08:44.135Z’ type=‘Number’ name=None geometryHash=None hash=‘4797e6b221232cb3486f29ae0a8b0855’ applicationId=None properties=None partOf=None parent=None children=[] ancestors=[] value=-9771.82156148549 __v=0 deleted=False

id=‘5b058bcd49b3520b9a4701ba’ private=False canRead=[] canWrite=[] owner=‘5ac0c6f2cc774c3379247c1b’ anonymousComments=False comments=[] createdAt=‘2018-05-23T15:42:05.517Z’ updatedAt=‘2018-05-23T15:42:05.517Z’ type=‘Null’ name=‘Object Doe’ geometryHash=‘Null.0’ hash=‘Null.0’ applicationId=None properties=None partOf=None parent=None children=[] ancestors=[] __v=0 deleted=False

id=‘5b058bcd49b3520b9a4701ba’ private=False canRead=[] canWrite=[] owner=‘5ac0c6f2cc774c3379247c1b’ anonymousComments=False comments=[] createdAt=‘2018-05-23T15:42:05.517Z’ updatedAt=‘2018-05-23T15:42:05.517Z’ type=‘Null’ name=‘Object Doe’ geometryHash=‘Null.0’ hash=‘Null.0’ applicationId=None properties=None partOf=None parent=None children=[] ancestors=[] __v=0 deleted=False

2

Hi @dtnaughton, sorry for replying late. Not sure what’s going on Object Doe is just the default name v1 populates for objects. It might something messed up at the Dynamo end? Sending a sample definition to reproduce this would help us!