The total number of elements in the model is 11,338.
In the second push, I made a single change: updated IPE200 to IPE300. On Speckle’s web viewer, it correctly shows that 6,742 elements were modified. However, when receiving the updated data in ETABS:
It creates a new frame property for IPE300,
But it doesn’t override IPE200 with IPE300 for the 6,742 elements.
Could someone help me resolve this issue or let me know if I’m missing something?
Are these updates happening within the same GH session? Or are these different versions sent on, for example, different days (after shutting down Rhino + GH and reopening things / after geometry script has regenerated baseLine)?
Please check the applicationId’s for me between the two versions. Below screenshot shows left the new version and right shows the previous version. As we can see, the applicationId remains the same.
Hi @bjoern, Thank you so much for such a detailed response. Yes, I did the same in the last 2 attempts and 3rd attempt alongside of @abreyjames but I didn’t update. I tried again this morning in 2 ways:
I tried to update the ETABS file created in the first push, but it didn’t update.
I recreated the ETABS file from the first push using Speckle. A few minutes later, I received the second push for an update, and fortunately, it worked.
And yes, the “ApplicationID” remained the same. My GH was close today. It’s strange that I used the same two existing versions on Speckle and repeated the exact same steps. It failed a few times, but now it updates.
Thanks for testing again and letting me know. To answer your question, no this hasn’t been reported yet.
If I‘m understanding your two scenarios correctly; the difference between Scenario 1 and 2 is that in Scenario 1 the ETABS application received a model which was saved and then closed. When reopening the ETABS application (and model) and trying to update this didn’t work as expected? The second scenario was a receive and update step within the same ETABS session. Have I understood that correctly?
Yes, that’s correct. In reality, Scenario One occurs when a senior engineer has already worked on the development, and we have an existing ETABS file that needs to be updated with a new revision after a few days or weeks.