Hey Specke Team,
you’ve surely heard of it already, but Autodesk has recently released Data Exchange:
Seems to be heavily inspired by how Speckle works but covers much less functionality and hides behind a paywall.
I’m cheering Speckle on but it’ll be interesting to follow their development too.
Hey @mariuszhermansdorfer, thanks for the heads up! As you can imagine, we’re following things closely. We’ve had conversations in the past with some Autodesk Forge people (Jim Quanci IIRC, and some others), and I did do my best to explain the benefits of being object based rather than lobbing massive files around, so it’s good to see this resonated
Was planning a longer reply, but you’ve nailed things - I don’t think there’s much to add to what you wrote above!
Hello @mariuszhermansdorfer and @dimitrie - Autodesk employee here! One minor correction on the ‘paywall’ - A docs subscription is required to write a data exchange, but not to read one. You need to be added to the docs project, and given permission, but no license is required to read the exchange into Inventor, Power Automate, Rhino, or Revit.
And yes, I’m a big fan of Speckle, the tech and community - and was a big fan of Flux prior to that - long time coming that Autodesk is addressing customer’s interoperability woes at the object level IMO.
Thanks for the clarification @Tobias_Hathorn. As I said earlier, it’s good to see Autodesk exploring this direction as well. Hopefully this will lead to healthy competition and maybe even collaboration with Speckle.
I for one would welcome Autodesk adopting and contributing to further development of an open-source standard.
I’m curious what that looks like to you @mariuszhermansdorfer - there are many open source standards, and many ways to contribute. So without assuming, I’d like to listen to any ideas you and the Speckle community might have in that area?
Agreed, there are many ways of collaboration. Here are a few ideas in a random order:
- Open source all proprietary file formats (DWG, RVT, MAX etc.)
- Offer targeted development grants to community members to develop specific features similar to Epic Megagrants
- Provide financial and intellectual support to open source initiatives fostering software interoperability (such as Speckle) similar to Blender’s Development Fund
- Remove paywall for full Autodesk Developer Network Membership similar to how McNeel provides free-of-charge developer support
Nice, thanks for sharing your mind, I feel a sense of agency in some of these areas, not all. A few thoughts and links related to your list…